|
Post by Angus Alien on Jul 3, 2005 17:05:07 GMT -5
uhhhh...yea.
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 3, 2005 23:53:24 GMT -5
is there any more opposition from the ...opposition. Does anyone else have a point they would like to bring up to defend marijuana?
|
|
|
Post by predalien 64 on Jul 6, 2005 11:57:12 GMT -5
well its ironic that the war on drugs is letting more crimes get away because there focused on drugs
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 7, 2005 20:14:32 GMT -5
How is this necessarily a war on drugs? The thing we're most concerned about right now is terrorism. Especially since that bombing of London earlier this morning. If anything, this is a fight for marijuana to become legalized...which doesn't look like it's progressing so far. I suppose if you're getting your statistics from the National Enquirer or the like, then crime would be a very big issue and has increased tremendously as a result of this "war on drugs." Any further discussion?
|
|
|
Post by predalien 64 on Jul 13, 2005 19:18:20 GMT -5
not from me
|
|
|
Post by DoomInductor on Jul 14, 2005 3:31:47 GMT -5
I say we forget about illegal drugs: if people want to load their bodies with toxins, let them. Set up designated areas for them to do so, and let them do so inside their own homes. Just don't let them in cars.
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 14, 2005 20:56:54 GMT -5
just so long as we're not liable to pay for the cost of their mistakes and don't have to pay their welfare or hospital cost, i agree. But we probably will end up paying through taxes anyways. And they usually don't only affect themselves when something does happen. Regulate the piss out of it and then we'll see.
|
|
|
Post by DoomInductor on Jul 15, 2005 3:10:06 GMT -5
Or we could go to a complete state of anarchy. Seriously. It's a true story.
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 15, 2005 19:39:08 GMT -5
Anarchy? No thanks. I like that theres a law preventing people from raping, torturing, and saddamizing me. I personally don't like that sorta stuff.
|
|
|
Post by DoomInductor on Jul 17, 2005 3:03:37 GMT -5
Rape? NO GUN LAWS! Torture? NO GUN LAWS! Saddamizing? NO LAWS AGAINST BEATING THE CRAP OUT OF YOUR ASSAILANTS! you could carry an m16 or desert eagle .50 around, and nobody would be able to jack be shit about it.
|
|
|
Post by predalien 64 on Jul 17, 2005 18:51:24 GMT -5
that would be cool being able to walk around with a desert eagle .50 cal but I'm entitled to agree with ucanda1, it good to have some order
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 17, 2005 21:50:26 GMT -5
If I could jus carry around a desert eagle .50 cal, thered be no laws statin that it had to be a certain quality. the manufacturers could screw you over. And plus, that means every godforsaken idiot could jus walk around with a desert eagle .50 cal. Just because you're a good aim doesnt mean you can get all the fuckin retards out there. One of them is bound to fuck up good enough to blow your brains out. We'd all be fucked.
|
|
|
Post by DoomInductor on Jul 18, 2005 2:35:14 GMT -5
I need to remember that nobody can read sarcasm.
|
|
|
Post by ucanda1 on Jul 18, 2005 21:45:25 GMT -5
Naw, usually I can. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by predalien 64 on Jul 26, 2005 22:56:55 GMT -5
sarcasm go fig
|
|